http://rasterweb.net/raster/2005/06/07/apple-intel-yawn/ RasterWeb! has been providing with bloggy goodness since 1997... Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:47:35 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://rasterweb.net/raster/2005/06/07/apple-intel-yawn/comment-page-1/#comment-343 Pete Prodoehl Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:12:13 +0000 http://rasterweb.net/raster/2005/06/07/apple-intel-yawn/#comment-343 Oh yeah, I definitely think it will be good in the long run for all involved (except IBM!) I do use Virtual PC and I'd trade it in a minute for actual Apple hardware that could run Windows for those rare occasions it's needed. As for AMD, that's what I had predicted as well, but I suppose Apple doesn't want to make the same mistake twice. Oh yeah, I definitely think it will be good in the long run for all involved (except IBM!) I do use Virtual PC and I’d trade it in a minute for actual Apple hardware that could run Windows for those rare occasions it’s needed. As for AMD, that’s what I had predicted as well, but I suppose Apple doesn’t want to make the same mistake twice.

]]> http://rasterweb.net/raster/2005/06/07/apple-intel-yawn/comment-page-1/#comment-340 mandrake Thu, 16 Jun 2005 07:44:51 +0000 http://rasterweb.net/raster/2005/06/07/apple-intel-yawn/#comment-340 You forgot NuBus to PCI. ;) Two or three years out, I think this switch will prove to be a very good thing. Faster Macs (for people like you) and easier Virtual PC (I expect to see VMWare join in) for us Windows users who would actually rather run both. Thought they would have gone with AMD tho. Whatever. You forgot NuBus to PCI. ;) Two or three years out, I think this switch will prove to be a very good thing. Faster Macs (for people like you) and easier Virtual PC (I expect to see VMWare join in) for us Windows users who would actually rather run both. Thought they would have gone with AMD tho. Whatever.

]]>