RasterWeb!Apple cracked the whip and those iPodder Lemon guys changed the name to Juice. (Perhaps they should do a tie-in with those Mattel Juiceboxes.)
Of course I was smart enough to avoid name problems with renko, but if I were the iPodder Lemon, er, I mean Juice guys, I would have changed the name to ipLemon, which works on two levels…
But that’s just me…
Mozilla Sunbird is still pretty alpha, but 0.2a has been solid for me for a really long time. I did manage to break WebDAV on my server for a week and kept wondering what went wrong with Sunbird, but in the end I figured it out, fixed it, and made a note not to break my WebDAV server again…)
Anyway, the Sunbird 0.3 alpha1 Release Notes tell all about the latest version, which I’ll be installing shortly…
I’m loving XAMPP… Out of curiosity though, I thought I’d check on the possibility of Tomcat being part of XAMPP… The result is in German, but I translated below: What(s) about JSP support in XAMPP?
No, anyhow with largest probability not. XAMPP would increase thereby around approximately 42 MB on over 60 MB (38 MB for the Java 2 SDK and 4 MB for Tomcat). For the moment I am convinced of the fact that it is not worth that.
There ya go folks… I’m not really a Tomcat fan anyway, but it would have been nice to have an easy to install, fully configured Tomcat to deploy… Oh well…
With the imminent release of a Firefox that supports SVG, I wonder if we are going to see a lot more warnings… Warning you say? Yes warnings…
In December 2004 I wrote a post that included some SVG graphs. When I checked the RSS feed for validation I got a warning. (Acutally, at the time I think it was an error, but I’m not sure about that, should have blogged it I guess.) You can check this feed using the validator to see the warning, which points you to the foo should not contain object tag page.
So I’m wondering if we’re going to see more people using the object tag with SVG, and if so, what will that mean for RSS feeds, feed validators, feed readers, etc?
I’m a big believer (complainer, pain in the ass) when it comes to using dates… I usually prefer to use the standard YYYY-MM-DD notation, but even when I don’t, I always try to include the year. It’s important stuff. I’ve suffered by looking back at things I’ve done or created and seeing things like “Recorded on May 9th and May 15th” without the year and believe me, 10 years later, you may be hard pressed to remember exactly what year those days in May refer to.
On the internet, you really need to put the year with things… I mean, look at this page:
In an e-mail to top executives, dated Oct. 30 and obtained late Tuesday by The Associated Press…
Oct. 30 what year? You will also notice that under the story title you see: Tue Nov 8,11:38 PM ET. Nov 8 what year?
They go on to use phrases like “last week” and “a decade ago” which doesn’t help the matter…
I like this example because for all we know Gates noticed this “sea of change” towards the internet 4 or 5 years ago, when most of us did… Ok, too much credit, chances are he didn’t realized it until 2005. In fact, I’d guess from the URL which contains /20051109/ and the part that says Copyright © 2005 The Associated Press that is it most likely 2005 they are referring to.
Maybe news organizations are used to the old way, where news was news until it wasn’t, but nowadays things stick around and get archived, and it’s too damn easy to search for something, pull up a page, start reading, and unless you can clearly determine the year by having it shown, it’s just too easy to get it wrong…
Old news folks… You could learn something from them bloggers…