Categories
Uncategorized

Pumpkin Chocolate Chip Cookies

Pumpkin Chocolate Chip Cookies

I’ve never been sure about publishing recipes, I mean, who holds the rights? But since people keep saying to me “Hey dummy! You can’t copyright/trademark a recipe!” I’ve decided to start publishing them…

Here’s my recipe for Pumpkin Chocolate Chip Cookies.

Ingredients

  • 1/2 cup butter, room temperature
  • 1 1/2 cups sugar
  • 1 cup canned pumpkin
  • 1 egg, beaten
  • 1 teaspoon vanilla
  • 2 1/2 cups flour
  • 1 teaspoon baking soda
  • 1 teaspoon baking powder
  • 1 teaspoon cinnamon
  • 1 teaspoon nutmeg
  • 1/2 teaspoon salt
  • 1 (6 ounce) package chocolate chips

Directions

  1. Preheat oven to 350-degrees F.
  2. Grease baking sheets with canola spray.
  3. In a large mixing bowl cream 1/2 cup butter with sugar until fluffy. Stir in pumpkin, egg and vanilla.
  4. Sift dry ingredients together (flour through salt) in a bowl.
  5. Add dry ingredients to butter mixture, stirring well to combine.
  6. Stir in chocolate chips.
  7. Drop batter by spoonfuls on to baking sheets.
  8. Bake for 12-15 minutes or until browned.
  9. Cool on rack.

These cookies do not flatten out like normal chocolate chip cookies. They stay sort of puffy. They’re almost like a cross between a cookie and a muffin. A cuffin? A mookie? I don’t know… I find them delicious though.

It should go without saying that you should use raw sugar (not processed!) and unbleached flour (not “enriched” or bleached!) and any other more natural/organic materials you can find. But it doesn’t. So I’m saying it.

Enjoy!

Categories
Uncategorized

Welcome to 1984, Apple

I think I first heard the phrase “The network is the computer” in the late 1990s. It was Sun Microsystems who wanted to convince us of this. I worked at a creative agency at the time, where we had pretty powerful Macs on every desk. We thought, sure, a dumb terminal or “network computer” was fine for office drones doing their menial tasks, but creatives needed more power than that… we needed to connect scanners, and color calibration devices, and weird disk drives, and work on ginormous Photoshop files, and things that required more than the VAX terminals we also used at the time.

Fast forward 15 years and what Apple has effectively given us is… a computer that looks like it’s nearly useless without a network. Hello MacBook Air. Don’t get me wrong… it’s a well designed piece of computer. The fact that it weight almost the same as an Eee PC I bought 3 years ago is not lost on me… nor is the fact that the user experience is probably 10 times better. But I still worry about where we are headed…

The MacBook Air has it’s place. But I just can’t help but feel like while hacker/maker culture is moving in one direction, Apple sometimes seems to be moving in the other… creating these sealed boxes that are definitely easy to use, but harder to open. Steve Wozniak must be turning in his grave. The Apple ][ was like the ultimate hacking machine when it came out… and now you can’t even connect a FireWire video camera to the MacBook Air.

In all this I hope Apple doesn’t forget it’s core creative audience. The ones who need Mac Pros, and need to install dedicated cards, and more drives, and tons of memory… The content creators. While the iLife suite gets these great improvements, many of us worry that the Pro Apps are being neglected. Does Apple take us for granted? Knowing that we’ll upgrade Final Cut Studio no matter what?

In the old days you could actually upgrade your computer instead of just getting rid of it and getting a new one. (You could even upgrade the processor!) I’ve been a fan/customer of Other World Computing for many years, and upon reading their write-up of Apple’s “Back to the Mac” event, it saddened me a bit:

Apple seems to be making things easier and more intuitive as well, but seems to be more enabling rather than empowering lately. We want to email our photos, Apple makes it drag and drop easy to put together one of four pre-made collages from our photos and pick an address to send them to. We ask for better tools to make videos, they hand us pre-built effects rather than tools to adjust them ourselves. We want to share our photos with our friends on Facebook, Apple automates and organizes it all for us. Are we as consumers going to gradually lose our ability to do traditional computing (using and upgrading) for ourselves as we conform our computing lifestyles to Apple’s one size fits all templates … and, as a result, is 1984 coming full circle?

Categories
Uncategorized

Foursquare Fun – Who is Here?

Foursquare I had this idea for Foursquare… I thought it might be cool for a venue to have a screen showing who recently checked in. So I dug into the API a bit to see if that could be done. Here’s what I got.

I fired up FoursquareX and saw that old pal tapps was at MOCT, which happens to be a bar/nightclub. (I know this because I’ve been there once… though it was a paid gig and I was operating a camera.) Anyway… I needed the venue ID (vid) for MOCT, which you can get from the URL: http://foursquare.com/venue/35578. Once I had that, I did this:

curl -u [USERNAME]:[PASSWORD]-o moct.xml 'http://api.foursquare.com/v1/venue?vid=35578'

(You’ll need to substitute your own Foursquare username for [USERNAME] and your Foursquare password for [PASSWORD]. Also, your username is your email address, not what displays as your name on Foursquare. )

This gave me a file called ‘moct.xml’ containing the data I needed. (Note that this API call requires authentication… without it you’ll get venue info, but not the list of people checked in.)

I won’t show you the entire file, but here’s the first part to look at, the stats:

  <stats>
    <checkins>764</checkins>
    <herenow>4</herenow>
    <mayor>
      <user>
        <id>2213098</id>
        <firstname>Kym</firstname>
        <lastname>H.</lastname>
        <homecity>Milwaukee, WI</homecity>
        <photo>http://playfoursquare.s3.amazonaws.com/userpix_thumbs/HA00BMYARP3JR0LD.jpg</photo>
        <gender>female</gender>
      </user>
      <count>24</count>
    </mayor>
  </stats>

You can see the important bits are: checkins, herenow, and mayor. The herenow tells you how many people are there right now. (I believe “right now” means, they have checked in within the last 3 hours.)

So here’s the info for tapps:

    <checkin>
      <id>226051620</id>
      <created>Wed, 20 Oct 10 23:17:23 +0000</created>
      <timezone>America/Chicago</timezone>
      <user>
        <id>76040</id>
        <firstname>tracy</firstname>
        <lastname>apps</lastname>
        <friendstatus>friend</friendstatus>
        <homecity>Milwaukee, WI</homecity>
        <photo>http://playfoursquare.s3.amazonaws.com/userpix_thumbs/NVS3B4M3YFMHTPZN.jpg</photo>
        <gender>female</gender>
      </user>
    </checkin>

And here’s a user named “Ty S.” who I do not know…

    <checkin>
      <id>226136078</id>
      <created>Thu, 21 Oct 10 00:20:45 +0000</created>
      <timezone>America/Chicago</timezone>
      <user>
        <id>714868</id>
        <firstname>Ty</firstname>
        <lastname>S.</lastname>
        <homecity>Milwaukee, WI</homecity>
        <photo>http://playfoursquare.s3.amazonaws.com/userpix_thumbs/I1STUJNEAQGMGQJZ.jpg</photo>
        <gender>male</gender>
      </user>
    </checkin>

We can construct the URL to his Foursquare page using the id: http://foursquare.com/user/714868, and if the user has a username set, it will redirect to custom URL. (At least, it will if you are logged in with your browser.) We can also see their photo, so you could do something interesting with that as well. (There are no access controls on the images, you should be able to see any of those.) You can also see their homecity and their gender. I’m sure you can come up with an interesting Boys vs. Girls display using that data… And for a nightclub, well, it just seems fitting.

OK, well that’s all the time we have for now, keep on hacking… and if you build anything interesting with this info, please let me know.

Update: I probably should have linked to the API docs as well: http://groups.google.com/group/foursquare-api/web/api-documentation

Categories
Uncategorized

Lady Gaga vs. Lady Ada

Lady Ada wants to help you make things and has a place you can get things from and a forum and a wiki and a blog and shares photos, and is a hacker and a maker and generally seems to be someone who wants to help you be creative and make neat things…

Lady Gaga… well, I’m still not sure what the heck she does…

Categories
Uncategorized

Ringy Dinghy

Ringy Dinghy

This is a photo of the “Ringy Dinghy” taken at Lake Michigan in Milwaukee, Wisconsin…

I started with a single RAW image and created 3 different exposures by processing the NEF file in Photoshop. Once I had the 3 files, I loaded them into Luminance HDR (aka ‘qtpfsgui’) which combined them into an HDR image, and I then tonemapped the image.

This part won’t mean much to you unless you are familiar with qtpfsgui (aka ‘Luminance HDR’) but these are the tonemap settings for this particular image. (I tend to use Mantiuk the most.)

TMOSETTINGSVERSION=0.5
TMO=Mantiuk06
CONTRASTFACTOR=1.532
SATURATIONFACTOR=2
DETAILFACTOR=11.9
CONTRASTEQUALIZATION=NO
PREGAMMA=1

Once I created the tonemapped image, I saved that, and then combined it with the middle exposure shot in Photoshop, just slightly blending the layers. Then I saved that file as our final image.

This is pretty much the technique I described as HDR+ back in 2009, and the method I used for my Red Barn photo.